Characteristics of COVID-19 Inpatients in Rehabilitation Units during the First Pandemic Wave: A Cohort Study from a Large Hospital in Champagne Region.

Background: Data describing patients hospitalized in medical rehabilitation wards after the acute phase of COVID-19 could help to better understand the rehabilitation needs in the current pandemic situation. Methods: Cohort including all patients with COVID-19 hospitalized in a single, large university hospital in Northeast France from 25 February to 30 April 2020. Results: 479 patients were admitted with COVID-19 during the study period, of whom 128 died (26.7%). Among the 351 survivors, 111 were referred to rehabilitation units, including 63 (17.9%) referred to physical and rehabilitation medicine (PRM) units. The median age of patients referred to rehabilitation units was 72 years. Patients who had been in intensive care, or who had had a long hospital stay, required referral to PRM units. Two biomarkers were associated with referral to rehabilitation units, namely, elevated troponin (p = 0.03) and impaired renal function (p = 0.03). Age was associated with referral to PRM units (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Almost one-third of COVID-19 patients required post-acute care, but only one-fifth had access to PRM units. The optimal strategy for post-acute management of COVID-19 patients remains to be determined. The need for rehabilitation wards during a pandemic is a primary concern in enabling the long-term functioning of infected patients.

Fatigue and quality-of-life in the year following SARS-Cov2 infection.

BACKGROUND: The SARS-COV2 pandemic has been ongoing worldwide since at least 2 years. In severe cases, this infection triggers acute respiratory distress syndrome and quasi-systemic damage with a wide range of symptoms. Long-term physical and psychological consequences of this infection are therefore naturally present among these patients. The aim of this study was to describe the state of health of these patients at 6 (M6) and 12 months (M12) after infection onset, and compare quality-of-life (QOL) and fatigue at these time-points. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was set up at Reims University Hospital. Patients were clinically assessed at M6 and M12. Three scores were calculated to describe patient's status: the modified Medical Research Council score (mMRC) used to determine dyspnoea state, the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the Short Form 12 (SF12) that was carried out to determine the QOL both mentally and physically (MCS12 and PCS12). Descriptive analysis and comparison of scores between M6 and M12 were made. RESULTS: 120 patients completed both follow-up consultations. Overall, about 40% of the patients presented dyspnoea symptoms. The median mMRC score was 1 Interquartile ranges (IQR) = [0-2] at the two assessment. Concerning FSS scores, 35% and 44% of patients experienced fatigue at both follow-ups. The two scores of SF12 were lower than the general population standard scores. The mean PCS12 score was 42.85 (95% confidence interval (95% CI [41.05-44.65])) and mean MCS12 score of 46.70 (95% CI [45.34-48.06]) at 6 months. At 12 months, the mean PCS12 score was 42.18 (95% confidence interval (95% CI [40.46-43.89])) and mean MCS12 score of 47.13 (95% CI [45.98-48.28]). No difference was found between SF12 scores at 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: This study pinpoints the persistence of fatigue and a low mental and physical QOL compared to population norms even after 1 year following infection. It also supports the claims of mental or psychological alterations due to infection by this new virus, hence a lower overall QOL in patients.

Association between Heparin Dose and 6-Week Mortality in Patients with COVID-19.

Background: Severe forms of SARS-CoV-2 infections are associated with high rates of thromboembolic complications. Professional societies and expert consensus reports have recommended anticoagulants for COVID-19 hospitalized patients. Our study aimed to compare the effect of therapeutic, intermediate and prophylactic doses of heparin on 6-week survival in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. Methods: The study sample is a French cohort of COVID-19 patients hospitalized between Feb 25th and Apr 30th 2020. Patients were assigned to one of 3 anticoagulation dose groups based on the maximum dose they received for at least three days (prophylactic, intermediate or therapeutic). The main outcome was survival up to 42 days after hospital admission. Multivariate Cox regression models were performed to adjust analyses for confounding factors. Results: A total of 323 patients were included. The mean age of the study sample was 71.6 ± 15 years, and 56.3% were men. Treatment with the intermediate versus prophylactic dose of anticoagulation (HR = 0.50, 95%CI = [0.26; 0.99], p = 0.047) and with therapeutic versus prophylactic dose (HR = 0.58 95%CI = [0.34; 0.98], p = 0.044) was associated with a significant reduction in 6-week mortality, after adjustment for potential confounding factors. Comparison of therapeutic versus intermediate doses showed no significant difference in survival. Conclusions: Our results reported a significant positive effect of intermediate and therapeutic doses of heparin on 6-week survival for hospitalized COVID-19 patients compared with a prophylactic dose.

Acquired decrease of the C3b/C4b receptor (CR1, CD35) and increased C4d deposits on erythrocytes from ICU COVID-19 patients.

In order to study the mechanisms of COVID-19 damage following the complement activation phase occurring during the innate immune response to SARS-CoV-2, CR1 (the regulating complement activation factor, CD35, the C3b/C4b receptor), C4d deposits on Erythrocytes (E), and the products of complement activation C3b/C3bi, were assessed in 52 COVID-19 patients undergoing O2 therapy or assisted ventilation in ICU units in Rheims France. An acquired decrease of CR1 density on E from COVID-19 patients was observed (Mean = 418, SD = 162, N = 52) versus healthy individuals (Mean = 592, SD = 287, N = 400), Student's t-test p < 10-6, particularly among fatal cases, and in parallel with several parameters of clinical severity. Large deposits of C4d on E in patients were well above values observed in normal individuals, mostly without concomitant C3 deposits, in more than 80% of the patients. This finding is reminiscent of the increased C4d deposits on E previously observed to correlate with sub endothelial pericapillary deposits in organ transplant rejection, and with clinical SLE flares. Conversely, significant C3 deposits on E were only observed among » of the patients. The decrease of CR1/E density, deposits of C4 fragments on E and previously reported detection of virus spikes or C3 on E among COVID-19 patients, suggest that the handling and clearance of immune complex or complement fragment coated cell debris may play an important role in the pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2. Measurement of C4d deposits on E might represent a surrogate marker for assessing inflammation and complement activation occurring in organ capillaries and CR1/E decrease might represent a cumulative index of complement activation in COVID-19 patients. Taken together, these original findings highlight the participation of complement regulatory proteins and indicate that E are important in immune pathophysiology of COVID-19 patients. Besides a potential role for monitoring the course of disease, these observations suggest that novel therapies such as the use of CR1, or CR1-like molecules, in order to down regulate complement activation and inflammation, should be considered.

COVID-19: A qualitative chest CT model to identify severe form of the disease.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify clinical and chest computed tomography (CT) features associated with a severe form of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and to propose a quick and easy to use model to identify patients at risk of a severe form. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 158 patients with biologically confirmed COVID-19 who underwent a chest CT after the onset of the symptoms were included. There were 84 men and 74 women with a mean age of 68±14 (SD) years (range: 24-96years). There were 100 non-severe and 58 severe cases. Their clinical data were recorded and the first chest CT examination was reviewed using a computerized standardized report. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed in order to identify the risk factors associated with disease severity. Two models were built: one was based only on qualitative CT features and the other one included a semi-quantitative total CT score to replace the variable representing the extent of the disease. Areas under the ROC curves (AUC) of the two models were compared with DeLong's method. RESULTS: Central involvement of lung parenchyma (P<0.001), area of consolidation (P<0.008), air bronchogram sign (P<0.001), bronchiectasis (P<0.001), traction bronchiectasis (P<0.011), pleural effusion (P<0.026), large involvement of either one of the upper lobes or of the middle lobe (P<0.001) and total CT score≥15 (P<0.001) were more often observed in the severe group than in the non-severe group. No significant differences were found between the qualitative model (large involvement of either upper lobes or middle lobe [odd ratio (OR)=2.473], central involvement [OR=2.760], pleural effusion [OR=2.699]) and the semi-quantitative model (total CT score≥15 [OR=3.342], central involvement [OR=2.344], pleural effusion [OR=2.754]) with AUC of 0.722 (95% CI: 0.638-0.806) vs. 0.739 (95% CI: 0.656-0.823), respectively (P=0.209). CONCLUSION: We have developed a new qualitative chest CT-based multivariate model that provides independent risk factors associated with severe form of COVID-19.

Corticosteroid therapy for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: a before-after study.

Anti-inflammatory drugs such as corticosteroids may beneficially modulate the host inflammatory response to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of addition of corticosteroids to the hospital protocol for treatment of suspected or confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia on rates of death or intensive care unit (ICU) admission. A before-after study was performed to evaluate the effect of addition of corticosteroids to our institution's COVID-19 treatment protocol on hospital mortality. A total of 257 patients with a COVID-19 diagnosis were included in this study between 3 March 2020 and 14 April 2020. As corticosteroids were widely used after 27 March 2020, two periods were considered for the purposes of this study: the 'before' period from 3-20 March 2020 (n = 85); and the 'after' period from 26 March-14 April 2020 (n = 172). The 'after' period was associated with a lower risk of death [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23-0.97; P = 0.04] and a lower risk of ICU admission or of death before ICU admission (aHR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.21-0.64; P = 0.0005) by multivariate analysis adjusted for age, National Early Warning score and institutionalisation status. In conclusion, addition of corticosteroids to our institution's COVID-19 treatment protocol was associated with a significant reduction in hospital mortality in the 'after' period.